NURS 6630 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience
Understanding pharmacology and neuroscience are essential tools for providers as they explore behaviors, uncover pathology, and treat disease. Medicines impact physiological and cellular systems in a variety of ways. Awareness of these concepts will allow for improved treatment of psychiatric disorders with better health outcomes (Camprodon & Roffman, 2016).
Agonist to Antagonist Spectrum of Action
Various substances such as drugs or medicines can interact with living processes through a spectrum of chemical reactions by binding to regularity molecules (proteins) and activating or inhibiting body processes (Camprodon & Roffman, 2016). Simply, agonists activate receptors. Full agonists produce maximal response that mimics the response to the endogenous ligand, such as methadone in the treatment of substance use disorder. Partial agonists produce submaximal response, such as buprenorphine also used in the treatment of substance use. An inverse agonist binds to the same receptor as the agonist and antagonizes the agonist action. It may also cause an opposite effect by suppressing spontaneous receptor signaling. Pimavanserin (5-HT2A) is an inverse agonist that is used to treat psychosis associated with Parkinson’s disease without extrapyramidal side effects. Antagonists prevent receptor activation or decrease or oppose another drug or endogenous ligand activity. Antagonists can be reversible and competitive meaning that they bind reversibly to the same agonist binding site, irreversible and competitive meaning they bind irreversibly to the same agonist binding site, noncompetitive or allosteric meaning they bind at a different site, preventing the action of the agonist, physiological or functional antagonists where they act on a different receptor producing a response that opposes the agonist, chemical where the antagonist forms a chemical complex with the agonist and reduces the agonist concentration, and finally pharmacokinetic meaning the antagonist influences the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of the agonist (Berg & Clarke, 2018). NURS 6630 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience Naltrexone is an antagonist that blocks (reversibly) the subjective effects of exogenous opioids.
Comparison of G Couple Proteins and Ion Gated Channels
Receptors are specific molecules that can interact with specific drugs causing a change in the receptors which then produce a change in regulatory function. The receptors translate the extracellular stimulation into intracellular signals. Two of the major membrane receptors are ion channel linked receptors and G protein couple receptors.
Ion gated channels open and close in response to a chemical signal like the binding of a ligand. The ligand typically binds to an allosteric site, away from the ion channel. The ion permeability of the plasma membrane then changes. Ions such as potassium, sodium, chlorine, and calcium will begin moving in and out causing a change in the electrical properties of the cell (Alexander, et. al., 2017). The duration of the effect of the receptor is short and the extent of the effect is typically short spread. Ionotropic receptors have a fast response time compared to G protein coupled receptors (Wacker, Stevens, & Roth, 2017).
G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest known class of membrane receptors and respond to many different external signals on cellular outer surfaces (Wacker, Stevens, & Roth, 2017). Structurally, GPCRs have seven transmembrane alpha helices. As the name implies, these receptors work with G proteins NURS 6630 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience. G proteins can bind guanosine triphosphate and guanosine diphosphate. G proteins that are associated with GPCRs are heterotrimeric (three subunits). Signaling molecules or ligands bind to the GPCR, causing the GPCR shape to change, and initiates a complex cascade of events leading to different cell function. Specifically, after conformational change of the cell, the alpha subunit exchanges GDP for GTP. This causes the alpha subunit to dissociate from the beta and gamma subunits and it begins to regulate target proteins, triggering the production of secondary messages that relay a signal to other cells. As long as the ligand is bound to the GPCR, this process will repeat itself. Eventually, the GTP can be hydrolyzed to GDP causing the ligand to leave and everything will return to its previous state, until a new ligand comes along (Wacker, Stevens, & Roth, 2017). In contrast to the ion gated channels, the duration of the effect of the receptor is long lasting and the extent of the effect is widespread (Alexander, et. al., 2017).
Epigenetics
Epigenetics is the study of inherited, reversible changes in gene expression without specific alteration of the DNA genetic code. Although actual casual relationships have not been identified, researchers have linked several epigenetic mechanisms to various disease states such as diabetes, cancer, and substance use disorder with differential expressions of certain genes leading to differential risks of disease (Schuebel, Gitik, Domschk, & Goldman, 2016). Identifying medication treatments such as DNA methylation inhibitors, bromodomain inhibitors, or histone acetyl transferase inhibitors that potentially reverse the epigenetic changes has very interesting clinical management possibilities (Ganesan, et. al., 2019). Broadly, epigenetic changes may be used to diagnose disease, determine therapeutic response, and monitor disease progression. Pharmacological modification of epigenetic processes such as small changes in specific regions like a single histone octamer or a single CpG dinucleotide may be used to target psychiatric disease (Gilardi, Augsburger, & Thomas, 2018) NURS 6630 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience.
Application to Clinical Practice
Understanding the principles of foundational neuroscience is essential as PMHNPs strive to uncover mechanisms of neurological disorders and to develop and implement pharmacologic treatment plans with the least amount of side effects and maximum positive outcomes (safety and efficacy). Knowing the specific actions of medications and what effects they produce will help the provider choose a drug that is safe, choose the appropriate dosing, and identify which clients are most likely to respond to treatment.
For example, consider the use of buprenorphine as treatment of opioid dependence. Buprenorphine is a partial agonist at the mu receptor which means it only partially activates opioid receptors. Interestingly, its analgesic effects plateau at higher doses, and then the effects become antagonistic. Buprenorphine has a high ceiling effect regarding respiratory depression which gives it a somewhat safer profile than methadone for agonist substitution treatment in addiction (Kumar, Viswanath, & Saadabadi, 2021) NURS 6630 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience. Buprenorphine is also a weak kappa receptor antagonist and a delta receptor agonist. Like mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors are G protein coupled receptors. Kappa receptor activation in humans can produce anxiety, dysphoria, and drug-seeking behavior. Buprenorphine as a kappa opioid receptor antagonists blocks these receptors and can reduce these stress responses and thus lessen depressive and addictive tendencies (Kumar, Viswanath, & Saadabadi, 2021). It tends to bind strongly to the mu opioid receptors with a slow tendency to dissociate. This will keep morphine, methadone, or other full agonist opioids from binding. The oral version of buprenorphine has poor bioavailability due to the first pass effect, meaning the liver and intestines breakdown most of the drug with little absorption, unlike sublingual administration (Oakley, Wilson, Hayes, & Lintzeris, 2021). Buprenorphine is metabolized by N-dealkylation and by the cytochrome CYP34A enzyme and broken down to norbuprenorphine and finally excreted in feces and urine. The half-life is about 38 hours. Medications that inhibit 34A enzymes such as ketoconazole or protease inhibitors may cause increased levels of buprenorphine, causing its effects to last longer. Medications that induce 34A such as carbamazepine, topiramate, phenytoin, or barbiturates may cause lower levels of buprenorphine. Stopping a CYP34A inducer medication while still taking the buprenorphine may cause an adverse reaction without a dosage adjustment due to possible increases in buprenorphine effects (Kumar, Viswanath, & Saadabadi, 2021).
Because of all these intricate properties and actions of buprenorphine, PMHNPs must ensure that they have up to date information, review psychosocial factors and other psychological treatment options with the client, clearly document why buprenorphine is being prescribed, discuss risks and benefits with the client, review other medications that may interact, and monitor the client closely NURS 6630 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience.
References
Alexander, S.P., Peters, J.A., Kelly, E., Marrion, N.V., Facenda, E., Harding, S. D… & CGTP Collaborators. (2017). The concise guide to pharmacology 2017/2018: Ligand-gated ion channels. British Journal of Pharmacology, 174(Suppl 1), 130-159.
Berg, K. & Clarke, W. (2018). Making sense of pharmacology: Inverse agonism add functional selectivity. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 21(100), 962-977.
Camprodon, J. A. & Roffman, J. L. (2016). Psychiatric neuroscience: Incorporating pathophysiology into clinical case formulation. In T. A. Stern, M. Favo, T. E. Wilens, & J. F. Rosenbaum. (Eds.), Massachusetts General Hospital Psychopharmacology and Neurotherapeutics (pp. 1-19). Elsevier.
Ganesan, A., Arimondo, P. B., Rots, M. G., Jeronimo, C., & Berdasco, M. (2019). A timeline of epigenetic drug discovery: From reality to dreams. Clinical Epigenetics, 11(174), 1-17.
Gerra, M. C., Dallabona, C., & Arendt-Nielsen, L. (2021). Epigenetic alterations in prescription opioid misuse: New strategies for precision pain management. Genes 12(1226), 1-21 NURS 6630 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience.
Gilardi, F, Augsburger, M., & Thomas, A. (2018). Will widespread synthetic opioid consumption induce epigenetic consequences in future generations. Frontiers in Pharmacology 9(702), 1-9.
Kumar, R., Viswanath, O., & Saadabadi, A. (2021). Buprenorphine. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/books/nBK459126/?report=printable on March 4, 2022.
Lerch, J. P., Van Der Kouwee, A. J., Raznahan, A., Paus, T. Johansen-Berg, H…& Sotiropoulos, S. (2017). Studying neuroanatomy using MRI. Natural Neuroscience, 20(3), 314-326. doi: 10.1038/nn.4501.
Oakley, B. Wilson, H., Hayes, V., & Lintzeris, N. (2021). Managing opioid withdrawal precipitated by buprenorphine with buprenorphine. Drug and Alcohol, 2021(40), 567-571.
Schuebel, K., Gitik, M., Domschk, K., & Goldman, D. (2016). Making sense of epigenetics. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 19(11), 1-10.
Wacker, D., Stevens, R. C., & Roth, B. (2017). How ligands illuminate GPCR molecular pharmacology. Cell 170 (2017), 414-427.